Authoritarian vs permissive parenting essay

So according to my logic, in the model we have:

  • The authoritarian parenting style: high demandingness, low responsiveness, low tolerance.

  • The permissive parenting style: low demandingness, high responsiveness, high tolerance.

  • The authoritative parenting style: high demandingness, high responsiveness, low tolerance.

  • The neglectful parenting style: low demandingness, low responsiveness, low tolerance

  • The harmonious parenting style: moderate demandingness, high responsiveness, moderately high tolerance.

Can you better define what you mean by “moral intuition” and how one makes a moral argument from said intuition? Do you think authority/respect, In-group/Loyalty, and Purity/Sanctity are ethical concepts? If so, can you defend them in terms of harm/care and fairness/reciprocity? I see these three aspects of morality as tools for enforcing or subverting compliance to ethics. Like any tool, it can be used as a weapon if held the right way. This fact does not make them bad; we need tools to build things… it just means we need to respect their power and use them wisely.

Authoritarian vs permissive parenting essay

authoritarian vs permissive parenting essay

Media:

authoritarian vs permissive parenting essayauthoritarian vs permissive parenting essayauthoritarian vs permissive parenting essayauthoritarian vs permissive parenting essay